"...consider the bright side of this scenario: If we post enough reviews, we may just get the movies we want. Start typing."
Here's the rest.
"Look, we're gonna spend half the night driving around the Hills looking for this one party, and you're gonna say it sucks, and we're all gonna leave and we're gonna go look for this other party. But all the parties and all the bars, they all suck. I spend half the night talking to some girl who's looking around the room to see if there's someone who's more important she should be talking to, and it's like I'm supposed to be all happy 'cause she's wearing a backpack."
"...consider the bright side of this scenario: If we post enough reviews, we may just get the movies we want. Start typing."
Not a bad article, but I wanted to kick the guy in the teeth every time he wrote "meta-paper." Trying to be technically accurate, or basking in his perceived intellectual superiority? You decide.
By Cody, at 8:01 AM, June 17, 2005
Well, he didn't invent the prefix "meta," so I don't fault him for using it. And the paper was about papers, so "meta-paper" isn't inaccurate. That's what I decided.
By Dan Carlson, at 8:17 AM, June 17, 2005
Dear Dan -
Can you sticky your email address to me at dustin@pajiba.com. I know no other way of getting in contact with you other than to use your blog comments.
We at Pajiba.com have been watching you. Closely. Very closely. But not in a creepy, leering homosexual way. I mean, sure ... sometimes in a leering homosexual way. But that's ... well. Whatever.