Saturday, December 10, 2005

Boring. Uninvolving. Costumes over character.

Clickety-click.

5 Comments:

Just finished reading your review of Memoirs of a Geisha and if you had actually read the book you would have realised that there is more to the story than "prostitutes" pouring tea and twirling their fans. However, given that you've only seen the movie it just goes to show that, as predicted, the movie was incredibly shit.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:26 PM, December 11, 2005  

Yeah, this is maybe the 11,000th ostensibly good book turned into an inferior film. You think people would catch on after a while. This is why I'm reluctant to see Narnia.

But I didn't read the book, never had any plans to do so, and don't see myself reading it any time soon. It's so far beyond my realm of interest that only a dear, true, trusted friend could persuade me to read it, and only after years of cajoling. And that friend would have to be Heidi Klum.

I know there's more to what geishas do than twirling fans and pouring tea. For instance, kimonos. And make-up. And tea pouring. It's a fascinating world. Fascinating.

Also, any exchange of sex for money, culturally condoned or not, pretty much falls into the realm of prostitution, as uncomfortable as that word may be to some. Tough but true.

By Blogger Dan Carlson, at 6:06 PM, December 11, 2005  

Great review. :) I read Memoirs of a Geisha a few months ago with my book club, and I couldn't put it down. I haven't seen the movie yet (?), but I can imagine that the movie won't translate the psychology behind those crazy geishas as well as the book did. End even after reading the book, we spent about an hour of our book club meeting trying to differentiate between geishas and prostitutes. The best American analogy we could come up with was a woman who dates a wealthy older married man, knowing nothing will ever come of it except a Prada purse and the occasional stay in a nice hotel.

I know I'm not Heidi Klum, but it really was a good book. But I won't push it too hard, because it's probably not your genre anyway, and the movie just may have ruined it for you. :)

By Blogger Chez, at 10:04 AM, December 12, 2005  

Some of the comments you're getting are great. I didn't know you were such a racist, you racist.

By Blogger Sarah, at 10:25 AM, December 12, 2005  

I'm actually pretty proud of all the insane, insane, insane comments I'm getting. Just goes to show you that you can never predict which review will be the source of baseless complaint and moronic responses. I thought that the nutjobs that responded to the Goblet of Fire review would be untoppable, because some of them were really unbalanced, but I was wrong. Geisha is causing the kind of tempest in a teapot I haven't enjoyed since college.

It seems that most of the people are pissed that I seem to lack respect for the culture just because I didn't like the movie. Well, it's not a good movie. It's overhyped, over-stylized, and uninvolving. I'm not even reviewing the book, much less the culture. I'm reviewing the movie, which was disappointing. And some idiot objected to my use of the phrase "training montage." Unbelievable. Sayuri, the main character, goes through a variety of practices in a sequence set to music, complete with narration like "What takes years, you must learn in weeks." It was a perfect example of a training montage.

But there's a bigger danger in accusing me of cultural intolerance simply because I disliked the film. It's taking social tolerance too far. Respecting a culture doesn't mean giving a free pass to every piece of media based on that culture. Disliking Will & Grace doesn't mean I'm homophobic, it means I don't like crappy sitcoms. If I gushed about Geisha and gave it a rave review, based not on its merits but simply on the fact that it's specifically about that culture, then I'd be doing a disservice to members of that culture and the profession to which I aspire. It's a film review, not a press release.

"...and if the Left has a problem with that, they should vote for somebody else."

By Blogger Dan Carlson, at 12:04 PM, December 12, 2005  

Post a Comment